<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HSUS is in Nebraska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s new in the world of agribusiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:19:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; ZimmComm Had a Busy 2009</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-59047</link>
		<dc:creator>AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; ZimmComm Had a Busy 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-59047</guid>
		<description>[...] on Agwired included: John Deere Unveils Largest Planter HSUS Challenges American Agriculture HSUS in Nebraska (tops in comments) Record Phone Calls on iPhone Get a Rustler from New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Agwired included: John Deere Unveils Largest Planter HSUS Challenges American Agriculture HSUS in Nebraska (tops in comments) Record Phone Calls on iPhone Get a Rustler from New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Update at 3 Strikes Ranch</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56871</link>
		<dc:creator>AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Update at 3 Strikes Ranch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56871</guid>
		<description>[...] a doubt, my past post on the 3 Strikes Ranch incident created an incredibly heated discussion from both animal rights supporters and animal welfare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a doubt, my past post on the 3 Strikes Ranch incident created an incredibly heated discussion from both animal rights supporters and animal welfare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicki</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56870</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56870</guid>
		<description>Kim, the reality is that if the economy wasn&#039;t in the tank, horses would be more valuable. Everything we own has decreased in value so why would horses be impervious to the economy? Over 100,000 horses were slaughtered last year so how did closing the plants have an impact? Horse slaughter is still thriving and filling the Belgian pockets. Neglect, abuse and hoarding, as was the case with 3 Strikes, has no correlation to the availability of slaughter. Horses were abused and neglected when the plants were open, it’s happening now with slaughter still available and it will happen when slaughter ends. The owners always feel they are taking good care of their animals and don’t have too many. They can always take in one more.

Closing the plants has also not had an impact on the over breeding. Legislation has been pending for years and instead of preparing for the end of slaughter, they continue to breed and dump. And they will continue to do so until they no longer can. As long as they have a dumping ground for their excess, the status quo will continue. Organizations like the AQHA whine about unwanted horses and then bring over 130,000 foals into the population every year. Wouldn&#039;t be so bad but they also have the leading breed going to slaughter. They spend millions trying to continue slaughter instead of helping their members keep their horses. Why not take that money to establish hay funds, euthanasia funds and educating owners on responsible ownership...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, the reality is that if the economy wasn&#8217;t in the tank, horses would be more valuable. Everything we own has decreased in value so why would horses be impervious to the economy? Over 100,000 horses were slaughtered last year so how did closing the plants have an impact? Horse slaughter is still thriving and filling the Belgian pockets. Neglect, abuse and hoarding, as was the case with 3 Strikes, has no correlation to the availability of slaughter. Horses were abused and neglected when the plants were open, it’s happening now with slaughter still available and it will happen when slaughter ends. The owners always feel they are taking good care of their animals and don’t have too many. They can always take in one more.</p>
<p>Closing the plants has also not had an impact on the over breeding. Legislation has been pending for years and instead of preparing for the end of slaughter, they continue to breed and dump. And they will continue to do so until they no longer can. As long as they have a dumping ground for their excess, the status quo will continue. Organizations like the AQHA whine about unwanted horses and then bring over 130,000 foals into the population every year. Wouldn&#8217;t be so bad but they also have the leading breed going to slaughter. They spend millions trying to continue slaughter instead of helping their members keep their horses. Why not take that money to establish hay funds, euthanasia funds and educating owners on responsible ownership&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56868</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56868</guid>
		<description>Oh I want all of my horses.  They are all extremely well bred and trained and I have paid to have a sick horse humanely put down when there was no other recourse.  I am talking about the economics of the horse industry.  These are not just large pets.  If you put a horse on Craig&#039;s list for $100 or for free you can bet it would be the order buyer&#039;s purchasing it to take to slaughter in Canada or Mexico.  No way would I send one of my high dollar animals out the door that way.  This is not a luxury.  These horses are working animals in a ranching area who are highly trained and valuable.  The economics of the industry are what dictate horse prices.  What if we could no longer slaughter cattle or chickens?  What would that do to the value of the animals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I want all of my horses.  They are all extremely well bred and trained and I have paid to have a sick horse humanely put down when there was no other recourse.  I am talking about the economics of the horse industry.  These are not just large pets.  If you put a horse on Craig&#8217;s list for $100 or for free you can bet it would be the order buyer&#8217;s purchasing it to take to slaughter in Canada or Mexico.  No way would I send one of my high dollar animals out the door that way.  This is not a luxury.  These horses are working animals in a ranching area who are highly trained and valuable.  The economics of the industry are what dictate horse prices.  What if we could no longer slaughter cattle or chickens?  What would that do to the value of the animals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56867</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56867</guid>
		<description>Steve,
Sorry I haven&#039;t answered but I&#039;ve been out in the little sun we have had, to take care of my horse and go for a ride on him. Anyway, yes, I&#039;m sure Craig and a lot of others do have a BIG stake in the tortuous death of horses since they seem to feel that the end of horse slaughter will end all animal slaughter. But I feel that most people fighting to save horses realize that is very unlikely because a lot of people like their burgers even if they aren&#039;t good for them. Kind of like cigarettes. Personally, stopping all slaughter is not my agenda for fighting to stop horse slaughter. I feel horse slaughter is both physical and mental torture for horses and I will never understand how anyone who says they love their horse would want them to suffer so. I guess I’ve just read or seen too much about their suffering over these years I’ve been fighting. I have not had my head in the sand about this issue and understand that a lot of people make money off horses. But horse breeders must look to the future and realize that the Yuppies of the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s are gone and will never be again. Horses as lawn ornaments and babysitters are not going to happen anymore and breeders had better start looking for a new way to pay their bills as horses will be a luxury to own. Horses are very expensive to keep and it is only going to get worse and land is going to be at a premium for raising food crops or food animals, which does not include horses. I feel that it takes way too much to raise a horse for food and it will never be profitable. But its not that groups like the AQHA aren’t trying to make it so. Talk about agendas! The AQHA wants to raise horses for slaughter to keep those registration fees coming in. And in order to do that they need to make horse slaughter acceptable to the American people since most think eating a horse is disgusting. Horse, the New Red Meat, is not something that will be accepted by many here. So lay off the HSUS on their supposed agenda and look at the agenda of other groups too. 

And by the way, I do want to thank those who raise or grow our food here in the United States. I wish we would stop importing so much and let our own farmers supply our food. It takes a special kind of human to do that job as it seems so thankless. A lot of people think their food only comes from the grocery store and don&#039;t know or care how it gets there. But horses are not a food source for Americans and horses do not deserve the pain and suffering of a slaughter house or the trip to it. Horse slaughter is cruel and inhumane and there is NO excuse for it! Not even greed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
Sorry I haven&#8217;t answered but I&#8217;ve been out in the little sun we have had, to take care of my horse and go for a ride on him. Anyway, yes, I&#8217;m sure Craig and a lot of others do have a BIG stake in the tortuous death of horses since they seem to feel that the end of horse slaughter will end all animal slaughter. But I feel that most people fighting to save horses realize that is very unlikely because a lot of people like their burgers even if they aren&#8217;t good for them. Kind of like cigarettes. Personally, stopping all slaughter is not my agenda for fighting to stop horse slaughter. I feel horse slaughter is both physical and mental torture for horses and I will never understand how anyone who says they love their horse would want them to suffer so. I guess I’ve just read or seen too much about their suffering over these years I’ve been fighting. I have not had my head in the sand about this issue and understand that a lot of people make money off horses. But horse breeders must look to the future and realize that the Yuppies of the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s are gone and will never be again. Horses as lawn ornaments and babysitters are not going to happen anymore and breeders had better start looking for a new way to pay their bills as horses will be a luxury to own. Horses are very expensive to keep and it is only going to get worse and land is going to be at a premium for raising food crops or food animals, which does not include horses. I feel that it takes way too much to raise a horse for food and it will never be profitable. But its not that groups like the AQHA aren’t trying to make it so. Talk about agendas! The AQHA wants to raise horses for slaughter to keep those registration fees coming in. And in order to do that they need to make horse slaughter acceptable to the American people since most think eating a horse is disgusting. Horse, the New Red Meat, is not something that will be accepted by many here. So lay off the HSUS on their supposed agenda and look at the agenda of other groups too. </p>
<p>And by the way, I do want to thank those who raise or grow our food here in the United States. I wish we would stop importing so much and let our own farmers supply our food. It takes a special kind of human to do that job as it seems so thankless. A lot of people think their food only comes from the grocery store and don&#8217;t know or care how it gets there. But horses are not a food source for Americans and horses do not deserve the pain and suffering of a slaughter house or the trip to it. Horse slaughter is cruel and inhumane and there is NO excuse for it! Not even greed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Masters</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56838</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56838</guid>
		<description>Kim:

What you fail to clarify is that &quot;you&quot; want to get paid to dispose of a horse of yours, rather than pay for humane disposal. At some auctions, horse slaughter buy prices are actually rising (depends on condition and location).  Don&#039;t know why you have 20 horses you don&#039;t want.  The auctions still exsist for KBs...better yet, do a Craig&#039;s List thing and say horse for $100 or even free...the KBs will beat a path to your door. Base price for a healthy, trained and well bred horse is not related to the kill price...but it is related to the economy and what people are willing to pay for what is basically a luxury item.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim:</p>
<p>What you fail to clarify is that &#8220;you&#8221; want to get paid to dispose of a horse of yours, rather than pay for humane disposal. At some auctions, horse slaughter buy prices are actually rising (depends on condition and location).  Don&#8217;t know why you have 20 horses you don&#8217;t want.  The auctions still exsist for KBs&#8230;better yet, do a Craig&#8217;s List thing and say horse for $100 or even free&#8230;the KBs will beat a path to your door. Base price for a healthy, trained and well bred horse is not related to the kill price&#8230;but it is related to the economy and what people are willing to pay for what is basically a luxury item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Masters</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56826</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56826</guid>
		<description>craig:

Forgot to ask...you talk to the sheriff or DA? BTW..we seem to have a boat load of foals on the way because BLM didn&#039;t castrate upon transfer/lease of ownership, didn&#039;t do background check on Meduna and the horse rescues involved did have some issues with handling and disposition. No one against horse slaughter is thrilled about this situation.

Who precisely turned you away, since you were there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>craig:</p>
<p>Forgot to ask&#8230;you talk to the sheriff or DA? BTW..we seem to have a boat load of foals on the way because BLM didn&#8217;t castrate upon transfer/lease of ownership, didn&#8217;t do background check on Meduna and the horse rescues involved did have some issues with handling and disposition. No one against horse slaughter is thrilled about this situation.</p>
<p>Who precisely turned you away, since you were there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56824</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56824</guid>
		<description>There is never an excuse for starving an animal.  Neglect is neglect plain and simple.  My partner and I own over 20 horses, all are fat and glossy.  But the reality of the market is that if the horse slaughter market had not been closed down, the price of horses would be up and we would not own over 20 horses that we cannot sell.  Right now it is more economical for slaughter horse buyers to buy animals at the local auction than ever before.  They can purchase these animals for pennies on the dollar and transport them to Canada where they are slaughtered and those people make money doing it.  Would it not be more humane to have the ability to dispose of these unwanted animals locally so that they are not transported thousands of miles, exposing them to injury and more stress?  Face it - people are abandoning their horses at an alarming rate because they do not have the money to feed the horses, let alone themselves.  If we were to create an outlet for these animals (unless you call abandoning the former cared for pets on public lands an outlet) we would also boost the horse market at the same time and horses would once again be worth something.  This is not a 20 lb. dog we are talking about here.  Try researching the cost of owning a horse once.  Meduna may be charged with multiple felonies, but really, what avenues were left to him if he was out of money and out of feed?  Shame on him for taking in that many animals without full knowledge of how many acres he needed to sustain them.  But that is only a small part of a larger problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is never an excuse for starving an animal.  Neglect is neglect plain and simple.  My partner and I own over 20 horses, all are fat and glossy.  But the reality of the market is that if the horse slaughter market had not been closed down, the price of horses would be up and we would not own over 20 horses that we cannot sell.  Right now it is more economical for slaughter horse buyers to buy animals at the local auction than ever before.  They can purchase these animals for pennies on the dollar and transport them to Canada where they are slaughtered and those people make money doing it.  Would it not be more humane to have the ability to dispose of these unwanted animals locally so that they are not transported thousands of miles, exposing them to injury and more stress?  Face it &#8211; people are abandoning their horses at an alarming rate because they do not have the money to feed the horses, let alone themselves.  If we were to create an outlet for these animals (unless you call abandoning the former cared for pets on public lands an outlet) we would also boost the horse market at the same time and horses would once again be worth something.  This is not a 20 lb. dog we are talking about here.  Try researching the cost of owning a horse once.  Meduna may be charged with multiple felonies, but really, what avenues were left to him if he was out of money and out of feed?  Shame on him for taking in that many animals without full knowledge of how many acres he needed to sustain them.  But that is only a small part of a larger problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56814</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56814</guid>
		<description>HSUS, Thank-you for providing some of the manpower needed to move 208 starving horses!!!
  Now please send hay, or money for the hay.
HSUS, Thanks for restricting local participation, through your association with this disaster. We know exactly who/what you are.
I was there also, no lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSUS, Thank-you for providing some of the manpower needed to move 208 starving horses!!!<br />
  Now please send hay, or money for the hay.<br />
HSUS, Thanks for restricting local participation, through your association with this disaster. We know exactly who/what you are.<br />
I was there also, no lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56812</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56812</guid>
		<description>You can thank HSUS for supplying some of the manpower needed to safely move 210 equines off the property where they were starving to death.  (Many locals helped out as well and should be applauded)  Then you can thank Habitat for Horses and Front Range Equine Rescue who will be coordinating the placement of those horses.  Many already have eager adopters stepping up.  All have been provided with immediate feed and attention.  To say otherwise is a flat-out lie.  I was there.

Jason Meduna doesn&#039;t make ranchers look bad.  He doesn&#039;t make horsemen look bad.  He&#039;s NEITHER of those things and anybody with two IQ points to rub together knows it.  This incident will not be used to make ranching or horse trainers or rescues look bad.  It only makes this individual look bad and shows the need for the BLM to do better follow-up if they are going to hand out horses like candy for $10 a pop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can thank HSUS for supplying some of the manpower needed to safely move 210 equines off the property where they were starving to death.  (Many locals helped out as well and should be applauded)  Then you can thank Habitat for Horses and Front Range Equine Rescue who will be coordinating the placement of those horses.  Many already have eager adopters stepping up.  All have been provided with immediate feed and attention.  To say otherwise is a flat-out lie.  I was there.</p>
<p>Jason Meduna doesn&#8217;t make ranchers look bad.  He doesn&#8217;t make horsemen look bad.  He&#8217;s NEITHER of those things and anybody with two IQ points to rub together knows it.  This incident will not be used to make ranching or horse trainers or rescues look bad.  It only makes this individual look bad and shows the need for the BLM to do better follow-up if they are going to hand out horses like candy for $10 a pop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56804</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56804</guid>
		<description>Reyna;
  I would never, and never meant to, appear that I was standing up for Meduna. I don&#039;t condone any type of animal abuse. 
   But our definition of animal abuse differs from PETA and HSUS.
 By the way, &quot;MA&#039;AM, PUT THE 2X4 DOWN AND STEP BACK FROM THE DOG, YOU&#039;RE BUSTED!!!!&quot;
  I&#039;m having ham and Great Northern beans as we speak (type)!!
I can send some beans your way if you need.
Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reyna;<br />
  I would never, and never meant to, appear that I was standing up for Meduna. I don&#8217;t condone any type of animal abuse.<br />
   But our definition of animal abuse differs from PETA and HSUS.<br />
 By the way, &#8220;MA&#8217;AM, PUT THE 2X4 DOWN AND STEP BACK FROM THE DOG, YOU&#8217;RE BUSTED!!!!&#8221;<br />
  I&#8217;m having ham and Great Northern beans as we speak (type)!!<br />
I can send some beans your way if you need.<br />
Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyna</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56803</link>
		<dc:creator>Reyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56803</guid>
		<description>Craig,

Animal hoarding is a weird thing and can be a full on mental illness. Meduna probably thought that no matter what state those horses were in, he was still the best--maybe the ONLY--person in the world able to take care of them. Only knowing the guy through his website and online words, it appears to me he is narcissistic enough to firmly believe that.

I have the utmost respect for farmers and ranchers. You do hard, honest work to put food on our tables. My main regret in life so far is not having spent enough time with older generations of my family before they passed. There&#039;s no one more knowledgeable, more practical, more useful and resourceful than an old farmer. To know just 1/10 of what they knew... 

You are totally right to suspect that the HSUS would use this incident to paint an entire group of hardworking people as being bad. My main point was that by defending bad apples like Meduna only makes the HSUS&#039;s job easier. There has to be a bigger effort on the part of farming/ranching organizations to educate the public in an honest way on how meat makes it on their plate. You could so easily take the wind right out of the sails of HSUS and PETA on the farming/ranching issues.

And with regards to promoting vegetarianism, you&#039;ve got the secret weapon the other side has no counter for: bacon.

Thanks for the debate. I have to get going and find a 2 x 4 with which to beat a dog who won&#039;t leave the chickens alone. :-)

Take care and be well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,</p>
<p>Animal hoarding is a weird thing and can be a full on mental illness. Meduna probably thought that no matter what state those horses were in, he was still the best&#8211;maybe the ONLY&#8211;person in the world able to take care of them. Only knowing the guy through his website and online words, it appears to me he is narcissistic enough to firmly believe that.</p>
<p>I have the utmost respect for farmers and ranchers. You do hard, honest work to put food on our tables. My main regret in life so far is not having spent enough time with older generations of my family before they passed. There&#8217;s no one more knowledgeable, more practical, more useful and resourceful than an old farmer. To know just 1/10 of what they knew&#8230; </p>
<p>You are totally right to suspect that the HSUS would use this incident to paint an entire group of hardworking people as being bad. My main point was that by defending bad apples like Meduna only makes the HSUS&#8217;s job easier. There has to be a bigger effort on the part of farming/ranching organizations to educate the public in an honest way on how meat makes it on their plate. You could so easily take the wind right out of the sails of HSUS and PETA on the farming/ranching issues.</p>
<p>And with regards to promoting vegetarianism, you&#8217;ve got the secret weapon the other side has no counter for: bacon.</p>
<p>Thanks for the debate. I have to get going and find a 2 x 4 with which to beat a dog who won&#8217;t leave the chickens alone. <img src='http://agwired.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Take care and be well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56801</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56801</guid>
		<description>Wow! This blog entry has really taken off. I think there have been some great discussions on this topic. While tempers flare on the topics of animal welfare vs. animal rights, the real agenda of HSUS, the tragedy of the mistreatment of horses and the loss of horse slaughter, I believe we have discovered one thing on AgWired: We all have differing view points.  We come from different backgrounds and experiences.  I&#039;m glad this is a place where we can discuss our differences, and I hope that the comments will help to encourage a healthy dialogue, not a mud throwing spectacle.  Thanks again for all of your input.  This has been an interesting forum as of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This blog entry has really taken off. I think there have been some great discussions on this topic. While tempers flare on the topics of animal welfare vs. animal rights, the real agenda of HSUS, the tragedy of the mistreatment of horses and the loss of horse slaughter, I believe we have discovered one thing on AgWired: We all have differing view points.  We come from different backgrounds and experiences.  I&#8217;m glad this is a place where we can discuss our differences, and I hope that the comments will help to encourage a healthy dialogue, not a mud throwing spectacle.  Thanks again for all of your input.  This has been an interesting forum as of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56800</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56800</guid>
		<description>My apologies to everyone involved. I think we&#039;re ALL a bunch of stupid humans.
  I have come to the conclusion, that both sides of the story here are correct.
  The problem is that both sides are looking at the situation from different angles.
  I am looking from my point of view, as if I were in Mr. Meduna&#039;s position. You are looking at this particular situation, from Mr. Meduna&#039;s true and actual position, and in THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, you are correct in the statement that in THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, horse slaughter is irrelevant.
  What I mean is: If I were the owner of a horse operation that didn&#039;t have funds  to care for the animals adequately and humanely, and I was wacked enough to do anything to keep them from dying, in my view, I would&#039;ve:(in order of priority)
1)passed them on to another horse rescue operation.
2)GIVEN them to &quot;good homes&quot;
3)open the gates, or take down the fences and letting them roam &quot;free&quot;.
4)Sold them to someone who promised not to slaughter them
5)last resort: sold to the first cash I came across.
  If I were not against horse slaughter, I think the rational thing to do would&#039;ve been to sell a portion of the herd (cull), into the commercial channels. The commercial channels would have more dollars available if the horse slaughter plants were running. Therefore slaughter would&#039;ve made it possible for me to sell say 10 horses at $400/head, rather than having to sell 100 horses at $40/head in order to raise the same amount of money for feed for the remaining herd.


You folks are looking at the situation from Mr. Meduna&#039;s position, which IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, is correct.
His apparent position is/was:
1)I wanted to save these beautiful creatures, I can&#039;t now, but I&#039;m not going to admit failure??????????????????????????????????????
2)see plan #1

I can&#039;t imagine what was going through his mind. I&#039;ve been trying to put myself in his frame of mind to see what his objective was, and I just come up with insanity and animal abuse.
  My point of argument was as if we were dealing with a sane, rational human being, which in this case does not apply.
   I can&#039;t even come up with a half ways sane thought process, from his side of view. I haven&#039;t seen the interviews of him, so it&#039;s hard to judge. But from what I know of the case, he needs mental evaluation.
   Whomever stated above that HSUS knew about this case &quot;a month or so&quot;, isn&#039;t up on their facts either, according to HSUS employees, they had 12 hours notice.
   I stand by all my statements about HSUS. They&#039;re bad news, and they promote vegetarianism. 
  What my original post has to do with HSUS is I DON&#039;T LIKE THEM MEDDLING IN MY BACKYARD, MAKING THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN FARMER/RANCHER, when in fact they want us out of business. They&#039;re liars.
   D.Masters, yes rendering of horses exists, but at negative value, there is no incentive to take unwanted horses by general public there, for a humane end, rather they just turn the horses loose to roam road ditches, countryside, or drop off at the auction barn.
  I bet this last year, if you add the abandoned horse numbers, and add the huge increase to those &quot;rescued&quot;, into the stats of slaughtered horses, you would see a large increase over your 2% of total numbers.
  I don&#039;t care how much notice HSUS and the other rescuers had of this situation, I personally haven&#039;t heard any public outcry for feed to be donated to these particular horses. It&#039;s being donated now because of our locals concern for the animals. I HAVEN&#039;T HEARD OF HSUS OFFERING TO PAY FOR THE FEED.
   There you have it. I&#039;d be happy to continue this blog if you guys want to. You won some points and I did also.
  It&#039;s time to get to work here in Nebraska. It&#039;s getting late and I haven&#039;t even had breakfast yet!!  
  I&#039;m getting so hungry I could eat a ------ NEVERMIND.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies to everyone involved. I think we&#8217;re ALL a bunch of stupid humans.<br />
  I have come to the conclusion, that both sides of the story here are correct.<br />
  The problem is that both sides are looking at the situation from different angles.<br />
  I am looking from my point of view, as if I were in Mr. Meduna&#8217;s position. You are looking at this particular situation, from Mr. Meduna&#8217;s true and actual position, and in THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, you are correct in the statement that in THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, horse slaughter is irrelevant.<br />
  What I mean is: If I were the owner of a horse operation that didn&#8217;t have funds  to care for the animals adequately and humanely, and I was wacked enough to do anything to keep them from dying, in my view, I would&#8217;ve:(in order of priority)<br />
1)passed them on to another horse rescue operation.<br />
2)GIVEN them to &#8220;good homes&#8221;<br />
3)open the gates, or take down the fences and letting them roam &#8220;free&#8221;.<br />
4)Sold them to someone who promised not to slaughter them<br />
5)last resort: sold to the first cash I came across.<br />
  If I were not against horse slaughter, I think the rational thing to do would&#8217;ve been to sell a portion of the herd (cull), into the commercial channels. The commercial channels would have more dollars available if the horse slaughter plants were running. Therefore slaughter would&#8217;ve made it possible for me to sell say 10 horses at $400/head, rather than having to sell 100 horses at $40/head in order to raise the same amount of money for feed for the remaining herd.</p>
<p>You folks are looking at the situation from Mr. Meduna&#8217;s position, which IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION, is correct.<br />
His apparent position is/was:<br />
1)I wanted to save these beautiful creatures, I can&#8217;t now, but I&#8217;m not going to admit failure??????????????????????????????????????<br />
2)see plan #1</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine what was going through his mind. I&#8217;ve been trying to put myself in his frame of mind to see what his objective was, and I just come up with insanity and animal abuse.<br />
  My point of argument was as if we were dealing with a sane, rational human being, which in this case does not apply.<br />
   I can&#8217;t even come up with a half ways sane thought process, from his side of view. I haven&#8217;t seen the interviews of him, so it&#8217;s hard to judge. But from what I know of the case, he needs mental evaluation.<br />
   Whomever stated above that HSUS knew about this case &#8220;a month or so&#8221;, isn&#8217;t up on their facts either, according to HSUS employees, they had 12 hours notice.<br />
   I stand by all my statements about HSUS. They&#8217;re bad news, and they promote vegetarianism.<br />
  What my original post has to do with HSUS is I DON&#8217;T LIKE THEM MEDDLING IN MY BACKYARD, MAKING THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN FARMER/RANCHER, when in fact they want us out of business. They&#8217;re liars.<br />
   D.Masters, yes rendering of horses exists, but at negative value, there is no incentive to take unwanted horses by general public there, for a humane end, rather they just turn the horses loose to roam road ditches, countryside, or drop off at the auction barn.<br />
  I bet this last year, if you add the abandoned horse numbers, and add the huge increase to those &#8220;rescued&#8221;, into the stats of slaughtered horses, you would see a large increase over your 2% of total numbers.<br />
  I don&#8217;t care how much notice HSUS and the other rescuers had of this situation, I personally haven&#8217;t heard any public outcry for feed to be donated to these particular horses. It&#8217;s being donated now because of our locals concern for the animals. I HAVEN&#8217;T HEARD OF HSUS OFFERING TO PAY FOR THE FEED.<br />
   There you have it. I&#8217;d be happy to continue this blog if you guys want to. You won some points and I did also.<br />
  It&#8217;s time to get to work here in Nebraska. It&#8217;s getting late and I haven&#8217;t even had breakfast yet!!<br />
  I&#8217;m getting so hungry I could eat a &#8212;&#8212; NEVERMIND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56799</guid>
		<description>I appreciate everyone&#039;s comments.  At this point I&#039;m only going to post any that have something new to say or I think would make a positive contribution to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate everyone&#8217;s comments.  At this point I&#8217;m only going to post any that have something new to say or I think would make a positive contribution to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56798</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56798</guid>
		<description>According to horseslaughter.com there were 90,000 horses slaughtered in the US for human consumption in 2005.  Is that your 2%?
Where do you get the idea that the meat is contaminated?  Oh, that&#039;s right, from your PETA and HSUS marching orders.  

Your facts and assumptions are baseless and tiring.  I weary of corresponding with someone who knows nothing and insists on proving it over and over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to horseslaughter.com there were 90,000 horses slaughtered in the US for human consumption in 2005.  Is that your 2%?<br />
Where do you get the idea that the meat is contaminated?  Oh, that&#8217;s right, from your PETA and HSUS marching orders.  </p>
<p>Your facts and assumptions are baseless and tiring.  I weary of corresponding with someone who knows nothing and insists on proving it over and over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56797</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56797</guid>
		<description>D. Masters,
So I understand that you are the arbiter of morality and ethics.  I wondered who was responsible for that. It&#039;s good to know that someone in your lofty position would take the time to enlighten the Dalit.

By the way, you pompous #$%, I&#039;ll put my educational background and economic/business experience up against yours any day.  Bring it on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Masters,<br />
So I understand that you are the arbiter of morality and ethics.  I wondered who was responsible for that. It&#8217;s good to know that someone in your lofty position would take the time to enlighten the Dalit.</p>
<p>By the way, you pompous #$%, I&#8217;ll put my educational background and economic/business experience up against yours any day.  Bring it on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Masters</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56796</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56796</guid>
		<description>Pete:  You need to learn the basics of Econ 101.  Pay particular attention to the chapter regarding &quot;supply and demand&quot;. And sorry, but your rights do not out trump morality and a simple thing called ethics. There are many people living on the land and in the city that think human consumption horse slaughter is unethical horse management peddling a contaminated meat product to humans. Horse slaughter serves less than 2% of the US Horse population.

And just an FYI, KBs/SHs never buy ALL the unwanted horses in the US.  They buy only what the need to fill an order and meet consumer demand. 3 Strikes has nothing to do with horse slaughter.  There were people and organizations that do and do not believe in horse slaughter that came to help these horses because of serious abuse via neglect. That sir, has nothing to do with HSUS OR horse slaughter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete:  You need to learn the basics of Econ 101.  Pay particular attention to the chapter regarding &#8220;supply and demand&#8221;. And sorry, but your rights do not out trump morality and a simple thing called ethics. There are many people living on the land and in the city that think human consumption horse slaughter is unethical horse management peddling a contaminated meat product to humans. Horse slaughter serves less than 2% of the US Horse population.</p>
<p>And just an FYI, KBs/SHs never buy ALL the unwanted horses in the US.  They buy only what the need to fill an order and meet consumer demand. 3 Strikes has nothing to do with horse slaughter.  There were people and organizations that do and do not believe in horse slaughter that came to help these horses because of serious abuse via neglect. That sir, has nothing to do with HSUS OR horse slaughter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56794</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56794</guid>
		<description>Reyna wrote:
&quot;And as for all you questioning why HSUS might have waited four weeks before going in on this rescue mission, don’t you think they’d best have their ducks in a row before embarking on something of this scale?&quot;  What did I miss?  I thought HSUS wasn&#039;t involved here!

Reyna, why don&#039;t you define what a &quot;factory farm&quot; is for those of us who are less enlightened than our city cousins.  I&#039;ve never seen one myself.  I&#039;m sure they&#039;re out there because I hear about them all the time.

D Masters, you completely missed the point Craig made about horse slaughter.  The difference is that if the meat was for human consumption the horses would have a floor on their value, if you have to pay to have them slaughtered then they have a negative value. (math101.com)

We out here in fly over country get incredibly weary of being told how to live our lives by the folks who have destroyed their environment, paved over everything in sight, and wrecked the economy.  If you want to preserve, then buy the land and the poor animals and preserve them, otherwise butt out.

As for USUS not being anti farming and anti meat go &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/pubs/gve/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reyna wrote:<br />
&#8220;And as for all you questioning why HSUS might have waited four weeks before going in on this rescue mission, don’t you think they’d best have their ducks in a row before embarking on something of this scale?&#8221;  What did I miss?  I thought HSUS wasn&#8217;t involved here!</p>
<p>Reyna, why don&#8217;t you define what a &#8220;factory farm&#8221; is for those of us who are less enlightened than our city cousins.  I&#8217;ve never seen one myself.  I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re out there because I hear about them all the time.</p>
<p>D Masters, you completely missed the point Craig made about horse slaughter.  The difference is that if the meat was for human consumption the horses would have a floor on their value, if you have to pay to have them slaughtered then they have a negative value. (math101.com)</p>
<p>We out here in fly over country get incredibly weary of being told how to live our lives by the folks who have destroyed their environment, paved over everything in sight, and wrecked the economy.  If you want to preserve, then buy the land and the poor animals and preserve them, otherwise butt out.</p>
<p>As for USUS not being anti farming and anti meat go <a href="http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/pubs/gve/" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Masters</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56791</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56791</guid>
		<description>Craig:

Honestly, so much of what you posted is just frankly incomplete/half-truths, distortion, spin and well, opinion. You know how I know?  Slaughter of US Horses still exists.  Check the USDA numbers.  Enough said.

And I told you, US Horses are STILL being slaughtered in the US.  I said you have to pay for it and it can&#039;t be consumed by humans. What reeally is your agenda here? Reyna makes some excellent points, not that I completely agree, but I did say clean up yourselves first and then tackle human consumption horse slaughter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig:</p>
<p>Honestly, so much of what you posted is just frankly incomplete/half-truths, distortion, spin and well, opinion. You know how I know?  Slaughter of US Horses still exists.  Check the USDA numbers.  Enough said.</p>
<p>And I told you, US Horses are STILL being slaughtered in the US.  I said you have to pay for it and it can&#8217;t be consumed by humans. What reeally is your agenda here? Reyna makes some excellent points, not that I completely agree, but I did say clean up yourselves first and then tackle human consumption horse slaughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Masters</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-2/#comment-56790</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Masters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56790</guid>
		<description>Pete:  Thank you for proving my point that the point of your posts aren&#039;t &quot;really&quot; about right/wrong or the slightest bit of logic.

And again, thank you.  I must have expressed myself in some way that got your hackles up (threatened you/your position)...ergo, they must have been reasonable and thought provoking and hack at your proslaughter stance.  Thank you.

Yes, I clearly understood the distracting &quot;prolife/abortion&quot; reference in the post.  Didn&#039;t think it worthy of response and basically an attempt to change the debate here. It&#039;s horse slaughter for human consumption (really) with a poster child like 3 Strikes Ranch and being infuriated that HSUS is in NE doing something, anything as some here are using as a rally cry. Fairly weak and disconnected logic if you take the time to understand 3 Strikes and the US horse slaughter situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete:  Thank you for proving my point that the point of your posts aren&#8217;t &#8220;really&#8221; about right/wrong or the slightest bit of logic.</p>
<p>And again, thank you.  I must have expressed myself in some way that got your hackles up (threatened you/your position)&#8230;ergo, they must have been reasonable and thought provoking and hack at your proslaughter stance.  Thank you.</p>
<p>Yes, I clearly understood the distracting &#8220;prolife/abortion&#8221; reference in the post.  Didn&#8217;t think it worthy of response and basically an attempt to change the debate here. It&#8217;s horse slaughter for human consumption (really) with a poster child like 3 Strikes Ranch and being infuriated that HSUS is in NE doing something, anything as some here are using as a rally cry. Fairly weak and disconnected logic if you take the time to understand 3 Strikes and the US horse slaughter situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyna</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56788</link>
		<dc:creator>Reyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56788</guid>
		<description>Um Craig, implying people are stupid is just that, implying they are stupid. I guess it&#039;s funny to you. We can agree to disagree on that.

I still don&#039;t understand why you&#039;re going on and on about the HSUS. Have you read their mission statement? No, they aren&#039;t involved in local animal shelters, but they NEVER CLAIM TO BE. They educate, they lobby and fund some sanctuaries to the tune of several million dollars a year and disaster relief. You seem to think you&#039;re exposing some big scam, but most thinking people knew all this already. I wouldn&#039;t give them a dime because like most big charities, their operating expenses are far too high, no matter what their mission statement.

And again, there&#039;s no slaughterhouse connection. The guy wasn&#039;t going to sell to slaughter ever! He was the shirtless cowboy, saving those little ponies his own sexy self. Fact of the matter is, there were slaughter plants open when he started this operation and he wasn&#039;t selling then either.

Now, you&#039;d better hurry because I heard Wal*Mart is having a huge sale on anti-HSUS tinfoil hats. They won&#039;t last long!

This dead horse has been beaten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um Craig, implying people are stupid is just that, implying they are stupid. I guess it&#8217;s funny to you. We can agree to disagree on that.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why you&#8217;re going on and on about the HSUS. Have you read their mission statement? No, they aren&#8217;t involved in local animal shelters, but they NEVER CLAIM TO BE. They educate, they lobby and fund some sanctuaries to the tune of several million dollars a year and disaster relief. You seem to think you&#8217;re exposing some big scam, but most thinking people knew all this already. I wouldn&#8217;t give them a dime because like most big charities, their operating expenses are far too high, no matter what their mission statement.</p>
<p>And again, there&#8217;s no slaughterhouse connection. The guy wasn&#8217;t going to sell to slaughter ever! He was the shirtless cowboy, saving those little ponies his own sexy self. Fact of the matter is, there were slaughter plants open when he started this operation and he wasn&#8217;t selling then either.</p>
<p>Now, you&#8217;d better hurry because I heard Wal*Mart is having a huge sale on anti-HSUS tinfoil hats. They won&#8217;t last long!</p>
<p>This dead horse has been beaten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Heading To Washington Watch</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56787</link>
		<dc:creator>AgWired &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Heading To Washington Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56787</guid>
		<description>[...] for why this animal rights terrorist organization is so inflammatory check out the comments on Amanda&#8217;s post about them being in Nebraska. I just got caught up on the latest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for why this animal rights terrorist organization is so inflammatory check out the comments on Amanda&#8217;s post about them being in Nebraska. I just got caught up on the latest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56786</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56786</guid>
		<description>Actually the safest thing for the horses would&#039;ve been to keep their previous owner locked up, then get feed to them asap, onsight.
  The law has to move the horses because they can confiscate the horses, but not the land, which is unfortunant in this situation.
  Reyna, I don&#039;t think you&#039;re stupid, but maybe a little naive. My comments were to cool tempers a little with humor. Humor is like beauty, in the eye of the beholder. Sorry if my humor doesn&#039;t fit your bill as humor.
  It&#039;s a huge responsibility to know when the end has come to an animals life. Animals that we are responsible for bringing into this world to do good things for mankind, but life ends at sometime for all living beings.
   I don&#039;t care to create issues for HSUS, but they seem to think that livestock producers are all bad and HSUS is in the business of putting all livestock producers/care takers out of business.
  Since you know much about HSUS, and I don&#039;t, maybe you can tell me how many animal shelters HSUS runs around the country? How many acres does HSUS own/control to provide for these horses? I understand the man recieving the majority of these horses owns a total of 27 acres in Texas, that is poor land, prone to flooding.
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF HSUS ANNUAL BUDGET DO THEY SPEND ON PROVIDING SHELTER FOR ABUSED ANIMALS?
 I know that HSUS had a negative effect on this particular situation, because their name was/is involved. Locals were asked to help with the round-up, but refused because of HSUS involvement.
   How come hay is in short supply for these horses? They were down to one bale yesterday. If HSUS has millions in the war-chest, how come they&#039;re not out buying hay as we sit here and argue? I donated time, money, hay and my back to this situation already, and was told the horses will be here another 2 weeks. TELL YOUR HSUS FRIENDS TO GET OFF THEIR DUFF AND SEND MONEY FOR HAY. There is hay available locally. Just needs to be paid for.
   HSUS didn&#039;t do a very good job of &quot;getting their ducks in a row&quot;, THE VERY FIRST THING A STARVING ANIMAL NEEDS IS FEED !!!!!!!!!!
   HSUS has millions in annual budgets, and they&#039;re depending on locals to donate hay in probably one of the biggest rescue situations in some time, if ever. Now what do you have to say?
  Lack of slaughter IS behind this situation, indirectly. 
   This horse owner bought many of these horses for $10-50/head. If there were a market for them, they would have brought hundred&#039;s of dollars per head and went to kill plants.
  Local salebarns are having horses dropped off and abandoned at their yards. If you try to honestly sell one at auction yards, you are required to put a deposit down, so that if the horse doesn&#039;t sell, the salebarn won&#039;t be stuck with the animal. 
  Reyna, do you really participate in &quot;shooting fish in a bucket&quot;? Not only is that illegal, that is non-sporting. I don&#039;t think your friends at HSUS and PETA would like you using that phrase. It implies immorality (in their opinion).
  Illegal aliens, and legal workers are actually paid quite well compared to other jobs they would qualify for. The only reason illegals do this work, other that the good (comparatively speaking) money, is that most citizens wouldn&#039;t/couldn&#039;t do it.
  Send hay, or money for hay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the safest thing for the horses would&#8217;ve been to keep their previous owner locked up, then get feed to them asap, onsight.<br />
  The law has to move the horses because they can confiscate the horses, but not the land, which is unfortunant in this situation.<br />
  Reyna, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re stupid, but maybe a little naive. My comments were to cool tempers a little with humor. Humor is like beauty, in the eye of the beholder. Sorry if my humor doesn&#8217;t fit your bill as humor.<br />
  It&#8217;s a huge responsibility to know when the end has come to an animals life. Animals that we are responsible for bringing into this world to do good things for mankind, but life ends at sometime for all living beings.<br />
   I don&#8217;t care to create issues for HSUS, but they seem to think that livestock producers are all bad and HSUS is in the business of putting all livestock producers/care takers out of business.<br />
  Since you know much about HSUS, and I don&#8217;t, maybe you can tell me how many animal shelters HSUS runs around the country? How many acres does HSUS own/control to provide for these horses? I understand the man recieving the majority of these horses owns a total of 27 acres in Texas, that is poor land, prone to flooding.<br />
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF HSUS ANNUAL BUDGET DO THEY SPEND ON PROVIDING SHELTER FOR ABUSED ANIMALS?<br />
 I know that HSUS had a negative effect on this particular situation, because their name was/is involved. Locals were asked to help with the round-up, but refused because of HSUS involvement.<br />
   How come hay is in short supply for these horses? They were down to one bale yesterday. If HSUS has millions in the war-chest, how come they&#8217;re not out buying hay as we sit here and argue? I donated time, money, hay and my back to this situation already, and was told the horses will be here another 2 weeks. TELL YOUR HSUS FRIENDS TO GET OFF THEIR DUFF AND SEND MONEY FOR HAY. There is hay available locally. Just needs to be paid for.<br />
   HSUS didn&#8217;t do a very good job of &#8220;getting their ducks in a row&#8221;, THE VERY FIRST THING A STARVING ANIMAL NEEDS IS FEED !!!!!!!!!!<br />
   HSUS has millions in annual budgets, and they&#8217;re depending on locals to donate hay in probably one of the biggest rescue situations in some time, if ever. Now what do you have to say?<br />
  Lack of slaughter IS behind this situation, indirectly.<br />
   This horse owner bought many of these horses for $10-50/head. If there were a market for them, they would have brought hundred&#8217;s of dollars per head and went to kill plants.<br />
  Local salebarns are having horses dropped off and abandoned at their yards. If you try to honestly sell one at auction yards, you are required to put a deposit down, so that if the horse doesn&#8217;t sell, the salebarn won&#8217;t be stuck with the animal.<br />
  Reyna, do you really participate in &#8220;shooting fish in a bucket&#8221;? Not only is that illegal, that is non-sporting. I don&#8217;t think your friends at HSUS and PETA would like you using that phrase. It implies immorality (in their opinion).<br />
  Illegal aliens, and legal workers are actually paid quite well compared to other jobs they would qualify for. The only reason illegals do this work, other that the good (comparatively speaking) money, is that most citizens wouldn&#8217;t/couldn&#8217;t do it.<br />
  Send hay, or money for hay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56785</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 05:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56785</guid>
		<description>D. Masters,
Thanks for making my point about the vitriol being spewed here.  It seems that there is a profound inability for rational discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D. Masters,<br />
Thanks for making my point about the vitriol being spewed here.  It seems that there is a profound inability for rational discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nona</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56783</link>
		<dc:creator>Nona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56783</guid>
		<description>Craig:
Your question is pretty ignorant dont you think?

Why Is The HSUS moving the horses?

Well, first there is an investigation and on that note, if you know much at
all, the safest thing for the equine is to get them far from Jason.

ON that note, why dont you call them and ask.

That would work wonders to leave them there and do an investigation on Jason&#039;s property, dont you think?

At any time he could kick everyone off the property.

But we know that you just seem to like to create issues 
for the HSUS.

They did not ask for this situation.Jason had time to ask for help, as he says 
GEE THINGS STARTED CHANGING BACK IN NOVEMBER.

Jason created the problem, now others have to do the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig:<br />
Your question is pretty ignorant dont you think?</p>
<p>Why Is The HSUS moving the horses?</p>
<p>Well, first there is an investigation and on that note, if you know much at<br />
all, the safest thing for the equine is to get them far from Jason.</p>
<p>ON that note, why dont you call them and ask.</p>
<p>That would work wonders to leave them there and do an investigation on Jason&#8217;s property, dont you think?</p>
<p>At any time he could kick everyone off the property.</p>
<p>But we know that you just seem to like to create issues<br />
for the HSUS.</p>
<p>They did not ask for this situation.Jason had time to ask for help, as he says<br />
GEE THINGS STARTED CHANGING BACK IN NOVEMBER.</p>
<p>Jason created the problem, now others have to do the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56782</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56782</guid>
		<description>I think the the government should step in with a bailout for the 3 strikes ranch and we should have a horse czar.  Barry can fly out set up his teleprompters over top the buckin chutes at the fairgrounds, tell us how he will call for a full investigation. 

I would venture to bet that most of the comments on this blog from people that think that hsus and peta are not a threat are probably flaming liberals and also believe that the current administration will somehow fix all the problems that one may have.  Wake up! I get so sick and tired of hearing how we need to save these horses. what about a horse that is over 20 years old has bad teeth and you idiots are out there trying to save it? how much money will be wasted for these horses to get back into shape and maybe be adopted?  unbelievable.!  How can this be a good investment. I will be on someone to tell me in a year how much money and time and headache these 200 horses cost the tax payers of morrill co. and the state of ne.  Buthcher, kill, slaughter, I don&#039;t care what you have to call it to make your self sleep at night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the the government should step in with a bailout for the 3 strikes ranch and we should have a horse czar.  Barry can fly out set up his teleprompters over top the buckin chutes at the fairgrounds, tell us how he will call for a full investigation. </p>
<p>I would venture to bet that most of the comments on this blog from people that think that hsus and peta are not a threat are probably flaming liberals and also believe that the current administration will somehow fix all the problems that one may have.  Wake up! I get so sick and tired of hearing how we need to save these horses. what about a horse that is over 20 years old has bad teeth and you idiots are out there trying to save it? how much money will be wasted for these horses to get back into shape and maybe be adopted?  unbelievable.!  How can this be a good investment. I will be on someone to tell me in a year how much money and time and headache these 200 horses cost the tax payers of morrill co. and the state of ne.  Buthcher, kill, slaughter, I don&#8217;t care what you have to call it to make your self sleep at night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyna</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56781</link>
		<dc:creator>Reyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56781</guid>
		<description>HA HA HA. Like shooting fish in a bucket.

mcgrewfarmer, can you please show us a list of these animal welfare/rights organizations that have taken a position on human abortion? Remember now, you said &quot;most,&quot; that means more than half have not only taken a stand, but are PRO-abortion. 

And is it that you will only have conversations with people who already agree with you? I don&#039;t understand how agreeing on abortion or infanticide at all relates to animal abuse.Certainly no one here is arguing that killing children is OK, but abusing animals is not.

Back to the subject at hand - HSUS would have NO power if the ag community showed some transparency instead of cowering in paranoia about the animal rights boogymen. Every single one of you know upstanding ranchers, good horse trainers, honest dairymen and farmers who bust their butts to make ends meet. You probably also know one or two who don&#039;t respect their animals, don&#039;t keep a clean barn, steal water or dump where they ain&#039;t supposed to. 

Heck I grew up next to several small dairy and egg operations. There was a family down the road who kept a small herd in a nice dairy barn, clean as a whistle. But across the street, hidden by trees kept the REST of their herd along with a few starving horses in some of the filthiest conditions you can imagine. PETA/HSUS would have had a field day with that place. Don&#039;t want PETA/HSUS in your backyard? Stop pretending that all farmers/ranchers/dairymen are irreproachable just by virtue of their profession. As an industry, do not tolerate abusive tactics on the farm, during transportation or during the slaughter process and stop making excuses for those who do.   

Right now, all the outside sees is stories about illegal immigrants being paid next to nothing to work in dangerous slaughterhouses that are unnecessarily abusive to the animals, who of course, were factory farmed in horrible conditions. And meat is bad for you, so don&#039;t eat it anyway. THIS is what more and more people believe, because you and I both know, they&#039;ve never even seen a farm, let alone a real live cow/horse/pig and all they have to go on is their Sunday night 60 Minutes report.

Be open and honest about how that tasty $40 steak makes it to a city slicker&#039;s plate and what all you do to get it there and HSUS/PETA will wither and die. Or don&#039;t. Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA HA HA. Like shooting fish in a bucket.</p>
<p>mcgrewfarmer, can you please show us a list of these animal welfare/rights organizations that have taken a position on human abortion? Remember now, you said &#8220;most,&#8221; that means more than half have not only taken a stand, but are PRO-abortion. </p>
<p>And is it that you will only have conversations with people who already agree with you? I don&#8217;t understand how agreeing on abortion or infanticide at all relates to animal abuse.Certainly no one here is arguing that killing children is OK, but abusing animals is not.</p>
<p>Back to the subject at hand &#8211; HSUS would have NO power if the ag community showed some transparency instead of cowering in paranoia about the animal rights boogymen. Every single one of you know upstanding ranchers, good horse trainers, honest dairymen and farmers who bust their butts to make ends meet. You probably also know one or two who don&#8217;t respect their animals, don&#8217;t keep a clean barn, steal water or dump where they ain&#8217;t supposed to. </p>
<p>Heck I grew up next to several small dairy and egg operations. There was a family down the road who kept a small herd in a nice dairy barn, clean as a whistle. But across the street, hidden by trees kept the REST of their herd along with a few starving horses in some of the filthiest conditions you can imagine. PETA/HSUS would have had a field day with that place. Don&#8217;t want PETA/HSUS in your backyard? Stop pretending that all farmers/ranchers/dairymen are irreproachable just by virtue of their profession. As an industry, do not tolerate abusive tactics on the farm, during transportation or during the slaughter process and stop making excuses for those who do.   </p>
<p>Right now, all the outside sees is stories about illegal immigrants being paid next to nothing to work in dangerous slaughterhouses that are unnecessarily abusive to the animals, who of course, were factory farmed in horrible conditions. And meat is bad for you, so don&#8217;t eat it anyway. THIS is what more and more people believe, because you and I both know, they&#8217;ve never even seen a farm, let alone a real live cow/horse/pig and all they have to go on is their Sunday night 60 Minutes report.</p>
<p>Be open and honest about how that tasty $40 steak makes it to a city slicker&#8217;s plate and what all you do to get it there and HSUS/PETA will wither and die. Or don&#8217;t. Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyna</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56780</link>
		<dc:creator>Reyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56780</guid>
		<description>Pete, does your amazement extend to those like Craig insinuating multiple times that people who disagree with them are stupid (&quot;Apparently some of you need me to type a little slower so you can understand&quot;) or on drugs (&quot;Maybe this crack problem has gotten out of control !!!!!&quot;)? Or just to those you assume to be left-leaning? Just curious.

Glad to see that someone else understands that this case has nothing to do with slaughter plants. 

And as for all you questioning why HSUS might have waited four weeks before going in on this rescue mission, don&#039;t you think they&#039;d best have their ducks in a row before embarking on something of this scale? Perhaps take the time to help assemble the rescue team? (They flew good horse rescue people in from across the country to help, by the way.) And to make sure there would be places to put the animals and resources to take care of them once they were seized?  Or maybe even to make sure that there really was a crisis going on and not just say, some weird poisoning event as the joker running the ranch claims? Or hey - maybe they were notified and worked together with local law enforcement and they arrived when they were ASKED TO?

Good lord, no. It can&#039;t be any of those logical things. It&#039;s gotta be just the next step in their plot to outlaw bacon in every state in the union.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, does your amazement extend to those like Craig insinuating multiple times that people who disagree with them are stupid (&#8220;Apparently some of you need me to type a little slower so you can understand&#8221;) or on drugs (&#8220;Maybe this crack problem has gotten out of control !!!!!&#8221;)? Or just to those you assume to be left-leaning? Just curious.</p>
<p>Glad to see that someone else understands that this case has nothing to do with slaughter plants. </p>
<p>And as for all you questioning why HSUS might have waited four weeks before going in on this rescue mission, don&#8217;t you think they&#8217;d best have their ducks in a row before embarking on something of this scale? Perhaps take the time to help assemble the rescue team? (They flew good horse rescue people in from across the country to help, by the way.) And to make sure there would be places to put the animals and resources to take care of them once they were seized?  Or maybe even to make sure that there really was a crisis going on and not just say, some weird poisoning event as the joker running the ranch claims? Or hey &#8211; maybe they were notified and worked together with local law enforcement and they arrived when they were ASKED TO?</p>
<p>Good lord, no. It can&#8217;t be any of those logical things. It&#8217;s gotta be just the next step in their plot to outlaw bacon in every state in the union.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://agwired.com/2009/04/23/hsus-is-in-nebraska/comment-page-1/#comment-56779</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agwired.com/?p=11376#comment-56779</guid>
		<description>Pete and mcgrewfarmer, I really appreciate your comments.  I&#039;d also like to add that comments need to address the issue and need to at least look like they are submitted by a human being.  Submitting a comment pretending to be a horse talking to another horse won&#039;t cut it.  Yes, I did delete that one.  Hopefully you will appreciate that we are willing to post dissenting points of view here.  Let&#039;s try to keep it civil.

mcgrewfarmer: until we respect all human life, from conception to natural death, we&#039;re going to see an unbalanced viewpoint like some of what we&#039;ve seen posted.  I pray every day that this will change in America and the rest of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete and mcgrewfarmer, I really appreciate your comments.  I&#8217;d also like to add that comments need to address the issue and need to at least look like they are submitted by a human being.  Submitting a comment pretending to be a horse talking to another horse won&#8217;t cut it.  Yes, I did delete that one.  Hopefully you will appreciate that we are willing to post dissenting points of view here.  Let&#8217;s try to keep it civil.</p>
<p>mcgrewfarmer: until we respect all human life, from conception to natural death, we&#8217;re going to see an unbalanced viewpoint like some of what we&#8217;ve seen posted.  I pray every day that this will change in America and the rest of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

